Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #813
- Timestamp:
- 05/16/19 01:55:50 (5 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #813
- Property Priority major → minor
- Property Resolution → Fixed
- Property Status new → closed
- Property Summary size2d too small → Memory Usage Underestimated in Report
-
Ticket #813 – Description
initial v1 1 It seems to me that size2d needs to be bigger, here and elsewhere: 1 The dynamic and automatic memory usage is underestimated in the standard output report because of the local variable '''size2d''' needs to be bigger in several modules. 2 2 3 3 {{{ 4 diff --git a/ROMS/Modules/mod_coupling.F b/ROMS/Modules/mod_coupling.F 5 index b8124ec..03cdce3 100644 6 --- a/ROMS/Modules/mod_coupling.F 7 +++ b/ROMS/Modules/mod_coupling.F 8 @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ 9 ! 10 ! Set horizontal array size. 11 ! 12 - size2d=REAL((UBi-LBi)*(UBj-LBj),r8) 13 + size2d=REAL((UBi-LBi+1)*(UBj-LBj+1),r8) 14 ! 15 ! Nonlinear model state. 16 ! 4 We need to have: 5 6 size2d=REAL((UBi-LBi+1)*(UBj-LBj+1),r8) 7 8 instead of 9 10 size2d=REAL((UBi-LBi)*(UBj-LBj),r8) 17 11 }}} 12 for the horizontal array size. 13