Hi all,
In ROMS-2.2 to restart the model using the last run output we have to switch on the NRREC value to -1. But in my experience I had find that when I switch on to NRREC value to 0 then only the model is running from the last step onwards. When I give NRREC value to -1 then it is running freshly i.e., from the first time step onwards.
about NRREC
Re: about NRREC
This actually happens if you set NRREC=1. NRREC=-1 means restart from the latest available field in the ININAME file. I didn't experience any weird behaviour on this using both ROMS-2.1 and ROMS-2.2.nageswararao wrote:Hi all,
When I give NRREC value to -1 then it is running freshly i.e., from the first time step onwards.
Thanks Jacopo and Kate for ur reply.
But when I gave NRREC value as 1 also it is running from the starting time step onwards. At the same time I undefined ANA_INITIAL in cppdefs.h.
I am also getting another problem that when I restart the model, the results for first time step are very bad i.e., I am getting very low temperature and salinity values,.... and for second time step the values are good. In my case, I am writing the weekly values in the average file, the first week values are very low and from second week they are good. Why it is happening
Thanks in advance.
But when I gave NRREC value as 1 also it is running from the starting time step onwards. At the same time I undefined ANA_INITIAL in cppdefs.h.
I am also getting another problem that when I restart the model, the results for first time step are very bad i.e., I am getting very low temperature and salinity values,.... and for second time step the values are good. In my case, I am writing the weekly values in the average file, the first week values are very low and from second week they are good. Why it is happening
Thanks in advance.
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 10:08 pm
- Location: GEOMAR | Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel
Hi,
I have the same problem with the very first values of history files - they are just slightly different, but the change is perceivable and occurs in every history file. This has happened with all 6 roms-2.2 configured on different machines. What I do to obtain time series for analysis is to skip this first value and then, for the analysis, to interpolate the time series on a regular time vector. I don't know why it happens, but I thought it had to to with the time stepping in roms (barotropic and baroclinic) - i.e. barotropic & baroclinic time step versus the time instant for the output.
Inga
I have the same problem with the very first values of history files - they are just slightly different, but the change is perceivable and occurs in every history file. This has happened with all 6 roms-2.2 configured on different machines. What I do to obtain time series for analysis is to skip this first value and then, for the analysis, to interpolate the time series on a regular time vector. I don't know why it happens, but I thought it had to to with the time stepping in roms (barotropic and baroclinic) - i.e. barotropic & baroclinic time step versus the time instant for the output.
Inga
inga