Ocean Modeling Discussion

'the Large and Yeager, 2009 variant of bulk fluxes' is provided in roms? I just find BULK_FLUXES and NL_BULK_FLUXES [Fairall et al, 1996] are provided in roms. It's in my branch of ROMS, which is full of all sorts of bizarre things. Search on "roms github kshedstrom" and you should find i...

detraceyb wrote:A Correction for Land Contamination of Atmospheric Variables near Land–Sea Boundaries

Thanks detraceyb. I will read this paper to find a method.

Thanks very much, kate. I agree with you about preprocessing the wind. But now I am not sure how to extrapolate properly. You are asking a second question, though. The trunk ROMS supports the Fairall et al. bulk fluxes. Some people don't like them, though, so we have brought in a Large and Yeager, 2...

Hi everyone, I found the wind stress near the coast was sometimes weird and model would blow up at some points next to the land, so I download the wind speed and calculated the wind stress. The wind speed I downloaded is at 10 m. Recently, I am confused about the calculation from wind speed to wind ...

Hi all, I tried two cases, one with 'define bulk_flux', the other one without bulk_flux. All the atmospheric forcing are from ECMWF-ERA-interim. Simulated salinity of two cases are similar. The simulated surface temperature without 'bulk_flux' is similar with SST of JPL data. But the simulated tempe...

Thank you kate. The blowing-up point is at the river estuary and is just next to the land points. Vertical resolution is [-1 -0.95 -0.9 -0.85 -0.8 -0.75 -0.7 -0.65 -0.6 -0.55 -0.5 -0.45 -0.4 -0.35 -0.3 -0.25 -0.2 -0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0]. The critical depth of the model is 5m. The depth(h) of the blowing...

Hi everyone, I run a case with daily wind-stress forcing for three years. It works well. But when I use the 4 times daily(every 6 hours) wind-stress forcing, it blows up after eight months. The last step before blow-up seems normal. The wind-stress also seems normal. I don't know how to solve the pr...